From the monthly archives:
Image: adaptation of margot the light courtesy of shoothead
If you’re new to this series, you may want to read our first article where we explain the four basic principles that are the basis of the Fish! philosophy, and how it can help you have a happier life. Today, we will discuss the third principle [...]
{ 0 comments }
The second in a series of four articles that explores the why and how of the Fish! philosophy:Choose your attitude; Make someone’s day; Have fun; Be Present
{ 0 comments }
The first in a series of four articles that explores the why and how of the Fish! philosophy:Choose your attitude; Make someone’s day; Have fun; Be Present
{ 0 comments }
Click here if you can’t see the video box above
If you read the article from last week, you know that over the coming weeks I will be discussing the four principles of the Fish! philosophy: Choose your attitude, Make someone’s day, Have fun, and Be present.
This month’s video is a sample of what the Pike [...]
{ 0 comments }
 |
In your Newsreader |
 |
In your email |
@timwtyler ok, I get your argument. But the theorem talks about arriving at decisions (or opinions) by majority vote. Unlike PM's RT @AndyCronin: EXCLUSIVE Video with Meaghan Marketing Director for OBAMA for America at ADMA Forum http://twitvid.com/DL9KU #admaf (via @lucio_ribeiro) If you want to see Tim Suther deliver a presentation similar to yesterday's at #admaf, visit http://bit.ly/9kR8sR & look @ the 2nd comment RT @lucio_ribeiro: Tim Suther on Twitter @timsuther @acxiom - His presentation #Admaf on SlideShare - "Hope is not Strategy" http://bit.ly/clB4jC RT @dministry: #admaf Oliver Blanchard ' As a two way conversation between brands and consumers Social Media is difficult to scale.' RT @devine_jenny: Social media has overtaken porn as the #1 activity on the Web, oh dear! #admaf @timwtyler so I guess it depends on the technology used to get knowledge from crowds. As in everything else, there's some better than others @timwtyler after all, predictive markets are a mechanism to aggregate knowledge and experience from the crowds scientifically. Isn't it? @timwtyler Not sure that the implication of Condorcet's Jury Theorem is that bigger crowds means either more correct or incorrect answers...
